vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameriprise Financial (AMP) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameriprise Financial is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $2.5B, roughly 2.0× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 18.7%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 5.5%).
Ameriprise Financial, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides various financial products and services to individual and institutional clients in the United States and internationally. It operates through four segments: Advice & Wealth Management, Asset Management, Retirement & Protection Solutions, and Corporate & Other. The Advice & Wealth Management segment provides financial planning and advice; brokerage products and services for retail and institutional clients; discretionary and non-di...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
AMP vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $915.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 18.7% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 57.0% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $915.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $583.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $511.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.0M | $159.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.6% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.1% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.0% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.39 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.33 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.73 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.83 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.57 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.00 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.02 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.3B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $355.9B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $184.4B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $355.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | $184.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.1B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $184.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $179.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $179.7B | $13.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $325.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $209.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.8% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.8% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.65× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.42× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.89× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.36× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.96× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 1.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMP
| Management and financial advice fees | $2.9B | 60% |
| Other | $872.0M | 18% |
| Distribution fees | $563.0M | 12% |
| Premiums, policy and contract charges | $341.0M | 7% |
| Other revenues | $166.0M | 3% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
