vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amprius Technologies, Inc. (AMPX) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amprius Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.2M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.8× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -96.7%, a 134.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amprius Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (137.4% vs -1.5%). SuperCom Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.6M vs $-5.9M).
Amprius Technologies, Inc. develops and manufactures high-energy density lithium-ion batteries using proprietary silicon anode technology. It serves aerospace, defense, electric mobility, and portable electronics segments, offering products with longer runtime and faster charging than conventional alternatives.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
AMPX vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.2M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-24.4M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 23.6% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -100.9% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -96.7% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 137.4% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -113.6% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.19 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-24.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -64.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -195.2% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -100.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -85.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -110.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -143.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -386.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -441.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -96.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -42.3% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -83.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -107.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -138.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -374.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -423.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $90.5M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $103.8M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $156.9M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.1M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $156.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $156.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.0M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.8M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.9M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -23.2% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.3% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-35.5M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.6M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -45.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.1% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -133.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -91.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -138.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -285.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -585.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 166.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
