vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. (MRAM) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.8M vs $14.2M, roughly 1.0× SuperCom Ltd). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs 8.1%, a 29.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs -1.5%). EVERSPIN TECHNOLOGIES INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-975.0K vs $-3.6M).
Everspin Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded semiconductor company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, United States. It develops and manufactures discrete magnetoresistive RAM or magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) products, including Toggle MRAM and Spin-Transfer Torque MRAM (STT-MRAM) product families. It also licenses its technology for use in embedded MRAM (eMRAM) applications, magnetic sensor applications as well as performs backend foundry services for eMRAM.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
MRAM vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.8M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.2M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 50.8% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -7.2% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 8.1% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.8% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1.5% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.2M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-670.0K | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-202.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.0% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -14.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.5M | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $68.9M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $84.6M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.1M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.9M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.6M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-975.0K | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.6% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 24.3% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.19× | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.1M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $881.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-975.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $543.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $527.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.16× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MRAM
| Transferred At Point In Time | $13.7M | 92% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.1M | 8% |
SPCB
Segment breakdown not available.
