vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($519.1M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.9× Fossil Group, Inc.). Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.3% vs -14.8%, a 11.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-15.7% vs -21.1%). Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-10.0M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Fossil Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-11.4% CAGR vs -22.4%).
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, formerly Contura Energy, is a leading coal supplier with underground and surface coal mining complexes across Northern and Central Appalachia. Contura owns large coal basins in Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia which supply both metallurgical coal to produce steel and thermal coal to generate power.
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
AMR vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $519.1M | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $-17.3M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.1% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | -3.3% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.7% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -711.2% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.35 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $519.1M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $525.2M | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.7M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $529.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.4M | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $669.8M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $800.1M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $861.3M | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-17.3M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.9M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.0M | $-24.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 52.4% |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.8% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.5% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.3% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.1% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.7% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.35 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.42 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.60 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.49 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.59 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $415.6M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.8M | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $415.6M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $457.9M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.0M | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $448.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.6M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $484.6M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.1M | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $269.4M | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6M | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $156.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $202.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $229.1M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $785.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $891.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.01× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.0M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.0M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.9% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.8M | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.5M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.5M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.1M | $622.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-10.0M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.6M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.6M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.0M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $132.5M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.6% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.54× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMR
Segment breakdown not available.
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
