vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) and Penumbra Inc (PEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Penumbra Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.4M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.4× Fossil Group, Inc.). Penumbra Inc runs the higher net margin — 12.3% vs -14.8%, a 27.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Penumbra Inc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.1% vs -21.1%). Penumbra Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($68.0M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Penumbra Inc's revenue compounded faster (17.6% CAGR vs -11.4%).

Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.

Penumbra, Inc. is an American medical device company headquartered in Alameda, California. The company was founded by Arani Bose and Adam Elsesser in 2004. It manufactures devices for interventional therapies to treat vascular conditions such as stroke and aneurysm.

FOSL vs PEN — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PEN
PEN
1.4× larger
PEN
$385.4M
$270.2M
FOSL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PEN
PEN
+43.2% gap
PEN
22.1%
-21.1%
FOSL
Higher net margin
PEN
PEN
27.1% more per $
PEN
12.3%
-14.8%
FOSL
More free cash flow
PEN
PEN
$90.6M more FCF
PEN
$68.0M
$-22.5M
FOSL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PEN
PEN
Annualised
PEN
17.6%
-11.4%
FOSL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Revenue
$270.2M
$385.4M
Net Profit
$-40.0M
$47.3M
Gross Margin
49.0%
68.0%
Operating Margin
-8.0%
15.4%
Net Margin
-14.8%
12.3%
Revenue YoY
-21.1%
22.1%
Net Profit YoY
-257.8%
40.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.76
$1.20

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$270.2M
$385.4M
Q3 25
$220.4M
$354.7M
Q2 25
$233.3M
$339.5M
Q1 25
$324.1M
Q4 24
$342.3M
$315.5M
Q3 24
$287.8M
$301.0M
Q2 24
$260.0M
$299.4M
Q1 24
$254.9M
$278.7M
Net Profit
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$-40.0M
$47.3M
Q3 25
$-2.1M
$45.9M
Q2 25
$-17.9M
$45.3M
Q1 25
$39.2M
Q4 24
$-11.2M
$33.7M
Q3 24
$-31.9M
$29.5M
Q2 24
$-38.8M
$-60.2M
Q1 24
$-24.3M
$11.0M
Gross Margin
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
49.0%
68.0%
Q3 25
57.5%
67.8%
Q2 25
61.3%
66.0%
Q1 25
66.6%
Q4 24
53.9%
66.8%
Q3 24
49.4%
66.5%
Q2 24
52.6%
54.4%
Q1 24
52.4%
65.0%
Operating Margin
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
-8.0%
15.4%
Q3 25
3.9%
13.8%
Q2 25
-2.9%
12.0%
Q1 25
12.4%
Q4 24
-4.8%
13.6%
Q3 24
-8.5%
11.7%
Q2 24
-13.1%
-27.0%
Q1 24
-11.5%
4.3%
Net Margin
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
-14.8%
12.3%
Q3 25
-1.0%
12.9%
Q2 25
-7.7%
13.3%
Q1 25
12.1%
Q4 24
-3.3%
10.7%
Q3 24
-11.1%
9.8%
Q2 24
-14.9%
-20.1%
Q1 24
-9.5%
3.9%
EPS (diluted)
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$-0.76
$1.20
Q3 25
$-0.04
$1.17
Q2 25
$-0.33
$1.15
Q1 25
$1.00
Q4 24
$-0.15
$0.88
Q3 24
$-0.60
$0.75
Q2 24
$-0.73
$-1.55
Q1 24
$-0.46
$0.28

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$79.2M
$186.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$169.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$112.6M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$701.0M
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.50×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$79.2M
$186.9M
Q3 25
$109.9M
$321.0M
Q2 25
$78.3M
$421.8M
Q1 25
$376.1M
Q4 24
$123.6M
$324.4M
Q3 24
$106.3M
$280.5M
Q2 24
$104.9M
$288.3M
Q1 24
$112.9M
$223.1M
Total Debt
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$169.1M
Q3 25
$165.6M
Q2 25
$167.2M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$162.7M
Q3 24
$173.4M
Q2 24
$156.5M
Q1 24
$202.9M
Stockholders' Equity
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$112.6M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$150.3M
$1.4B
Q2 25
$140.6M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.2B
Q4 24
$148.7M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$164.4M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$189.6M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$229.1M
$1.2B
Total Assets
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$701.0M
$1.8B
Q3 25
$704.5M
$1.7B
Q2 25
$686.0M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.6B
Q4 24
$763.6M
$1.5B
Q3 24
$812.4M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$785.7M
$1.5B
Q1 24
$891.0M
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
1.50×
Q3 25
1.10×
Q2 25
1.19×
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.09×
Q3 24
1.06×
Q2 24
0.83×
Q1 24
0.89×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-22.2M
$86.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-22.5M
$68.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-8.3%
17.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.1%
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.83×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-46.0M
$174.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$-22.2M
$86.5M
Q3 25
$9.4M
$58.3M
Q2 25
$-60.4M
$44.9M
Q1 25
$49.0M
Q4 24
$30.5M
$51.1M
Q3 24
$-22.8M
$56.5M
Q2 24
$38.4M
$22.6M
Q1 24
$622.0K
$38.3M
Free Cash Flow
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
$-22.5M
$68.0M
Q3 25
$8.6M
$42.0M
Q2 25
$-60.6M
$29.4M
Q1 25
$35.5M
Q4 24
$28.5M
$45.7M
Q3 24
$-24.1M
$51.0M
Q2 24
$36.6M
$18.1M
Q1 24
$-1.1M
$32.5M
FCF Margin
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
-8.3%
17.7%
Q3 25
3.9%
11.8%
Q2 25
-26.0%
8.7%
Q1 25
11.0%
Q4 24
8.3%
14.5%
Q3 24
-8.4%
16.9%
Q2 24
14.1%
6.0%
Q1 24
-0.4%
11.7%
Capex Intensity
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
0.1%
4.8%
Q3 25
0.4%
4.6%
Q2 25
0.1%
4.6%
Q1 25
4.2%
Q4 24
0.6%
1.7%
Q3 24
0.4%
1.8%
Q2 24
0.7%
1.5%
Q1 24
0.7%
2.1%
Cash Conversion
FOSL
FOSL
PEN
PEN
Q4 25
1.83×
Q3 25
1.27×
Q2 25
0.99×
Q1 25
1.25×
Q4 24
1.52×
Q3 24
1.91×
Q2 24
Q1 24
3.48×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

FOSL
FOSL

Transferred At Point In Time$109.7M41%
Traditional Watches$91.3M34%
Other$50.8M19%
Leathers$9.5M4%
Jewelry$4.0M1%
Smartwatches$3.3M1%
Products Other$1.6M1%

PEN
PEN

Thrombectomy$254.7M66%
Other$130.7M34%

Related Comparisons