vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and SAUL CENTERS, INC. (BFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SAUL CENTERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.1M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.0× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 8.7%, a 149.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 10.6%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Saul Centers, Inc. is a self-administered real estate investment trust (REIT) headquartered in the United States. It primarily owns, operates, and develops high-quality shopping centers, mixed-use properties, and multifamily residential assets, with its core portfolio concentrated in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and other select high-growth U.S. regional markets.
AMSC vs BFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $75.1M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 65.4% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 8.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -19.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $70.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $71.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $67.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $67.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $66.7M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 73.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 74.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 72.8% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 65.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 66.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 72.4% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 20.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $8.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $468.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $307.8M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $468.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $455.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $316.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $322.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $328.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $335.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $341.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $345.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $347.1M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $99.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 15.35× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $26.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $121.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $33.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-28.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -42.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -17.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 81.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 66.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 68.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 15.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 3.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 14.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.48× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
BFS
Segment breakdown not available.
