vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($74.5M vs $67.7M, roughly 1.1× Chatham Lodging Trust). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 6.8%, a 151.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs -0.5%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Chatham Lodging Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in, owns, and operates upscale extended-stay and select-service premium hotel properties primarily across high-demand urban and suburban markets in the United States. Its portfolio targets assets with strong occupancy rates and steady cash flow from business and leisure traveler segments.
AMSC vs CLDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $67.7M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 15.9% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 6.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 369.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $80.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $75.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $86.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $68.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 46.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 38.9% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -7.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $24.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $338.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $740.8M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $24.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $17.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $18.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $72.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $338.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $338.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $351.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $740.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $749.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $754.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $754.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $758.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $765.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $766.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $765.0M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 13.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $73.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 13.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 7.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | 2.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
CLDT
| Occupancy | $61.5M | 91% |
| Hotel Other | $4.2M | 6% |
| Food And Beverage | $1.8M | 3% |
| Hotel | $1.1M | 2% |
