vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Core Scientific, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($79.8M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). Core Scientific, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 268.5% vs 158.1%, a 110.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs -16.0%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-450.8M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs -33.3%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Core Scientific is a leading digital asset and high-performance computing infrastructure provider. It operates large energy-efficient data centers across North America, offering cryptocurrency mining services, colocation hosting for blockchain and AI clients, and custom high-performance computing solutions for enterprise tech segments.
AMSC vs CORZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $79.8M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $214.2M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 26.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -149.5% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 268.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | -16.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | 180.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $79.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $79.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $94.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $95.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $141.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $179.3M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $214.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-144.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-936.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $576.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-265.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-455.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-902.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $210.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 43.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -149.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -67.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -59.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -64.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 30.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 268.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -177.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -1191.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 724.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -279.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -477.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -639.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 117.5% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-1.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $1.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-5.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $311.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $-962.7M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $453.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $581.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $697.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $836.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $96.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $98.1M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $-962.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $-308.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $-943.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $-826.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $-318.5M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $824.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $664.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $814.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $278.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-450.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | -565.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 914.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 1.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $-779.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $278.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $131.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $42.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-450.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-112.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-87.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-52.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -565.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -139.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -111.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -162.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -54.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -26.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 914.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 301.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 154.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 105.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 100.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 32.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 17.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | -0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
CORZ
| Other | $36.3M | 46% |
| Digital Asset Self Mining Service | $31.8M | 40% |
| Colocation Service | $11.6M | 15% |
