vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hippo Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.4M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.6× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs 5.0%, a 153.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 18.2%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 18.9%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
AMSC vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
