vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and High Tide Inc. (HITI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High Tide Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($142.5M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.9× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -1.9%, a 160.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
High Tide Inc. is a Canada-based consumer retail and lifestyle company focused on the global cannabis sector. It operates a large network of licensed cannabis dispensaries across North America, sells cannabis consumption accessories and branded cannabis products, and runs multiple leading e-commerce platforms catering to recreational and medical cannabis users.
AMSC vs HITI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $142.5M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 0.0% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $142.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $124.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $128.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $991.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $166.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
HITI
Segment breakdown not available.
