vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. (OLPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($105.1M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.4× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -12.5%, a 170.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 4.3%). OLAPLEX HOLDINGS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($32.6M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. is a specialty beauty company developing and selling patented bond-repair hair care products. It runs three core segments: professional salon distribution, direct-to-consumer sales, and third-party retail, serving customers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific with products that repair and protect damaged hair.
AMSC vs OLPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $105.1M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-13.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -4.3% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -48.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $105.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $114.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $106.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $97.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $103.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $98.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $465.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 68.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 69.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 71.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 69.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 66.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 68.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 69.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 72.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $318.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $352.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $879.4M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $286.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $289.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $580.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $586.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $538.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $507.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $507.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $352.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $352.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $351.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $649.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $650.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $651.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $653.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $654.4M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $879.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $888.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $874.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $878.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $874.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $879.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $863.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $855.7M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.76× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $32.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $32.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 31.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $58.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $32.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $43.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $49.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $43.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 43.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | -6.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 2.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
OLPX
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $43.6M | 42% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Professional | $36.8M | 35% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary Specialty Retail | $24.7M | 23% |
