vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Repay Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.6M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -178.3%, a 336.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 0.4%). Repay Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.2M vs $2.4M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs -1.3%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.
AMSC vs RPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $78.6M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-140.1M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -182.2% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -178.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -3304.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $77.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $80.7M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $-140.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-102.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | 76.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -182.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -138.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | -178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $115.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $280.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $484.4M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $95.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $128.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $279.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $497.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $496.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $496.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $435.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $434.9M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $484.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $616.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $633.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $755.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $754.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $815.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $813.8M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | 29.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $90.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 30.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | 18.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
RPAY
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $69.4M | 88% |
| Other | $6.8M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $2.3M | 3% |
