vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP (AMSC) and SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO (SHEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SHENANDOAH TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($91.6M vs $74.5M, roughly 1.2× AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP runs the higher net margin — 158.1% vs -5.9%, a 163.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 7.2%). AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.4M vs $-78.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP's revenue compounded faster (33.2% CAGR vs 15.0%).
Anglo American plc is a British multinational mining company with headquarters in London, England. It is the world's largest producer of platinum, representing approximately 40 percent of global output, as well as being a major producer of diamonds, copper, nickel, iron ore, polyhalite and steelmaking coal. The company has operations in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co is a U.S. regional telecom provider offering broadband internet, wireless voice/data services, digital cable TV, and fiber-optic solutions. It serves residential, small business and enterprise clients across Mid-Atlantic states, focusing on underserved rural and suburban markets in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
AMSC vs SHEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $74.5M | $91.6M |
| Net Profit | $117.8M | $-5.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | 158.1% | -5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.4% | 7.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4679.1% | -95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $74.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.9M | $89.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $88.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.7M | $87.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.4M | $85.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.5M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $85.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | $69.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $214.7M |
| Q4 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 158.1% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.3% | -15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.8% | 310.0% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.11 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.03 | $4.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $141.1M | $27.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $536.8M | $880.8M |
| Total Assets | $719.5M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $141.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $212.9M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.9M | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.5M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.2M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $72.1M | $43.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.5M | $389.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $642.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $535.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $513.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $515.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $345.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $298.7M |
| Q4 25 | $536.8M | $880.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $342.2M | $892.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.1M | $902.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.1M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $192.7M | $918.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $187.0M | $925.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $143.3M | $933.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.6M | $871.6M |
| Q4 25 | $719.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $445.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $310.5M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $240.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $232.8M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.2M | $28.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.4M | $-78.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.2% | -85.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | 117.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.03× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.0M | $-257.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $20.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $20.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.7M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $-51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $-65.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $-62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | $-72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1M | $-51.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $-78.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $-54.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | -85.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.7% | -57.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -71.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | -84.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.3% | -58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | -91.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -79.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 117.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 91.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 97.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 94.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 108.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 86.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 94.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 101.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.22× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSC
| Equipment And Systems | $56.0M | 75% |
| Megatran | $14.1M | 19% |
| Comtrafo Industria De Transformadores Eletricos SA | $4.6M | 6% |
SHEN
| Residential And SMB Incumbent Broadband | $41.5M | 45% |
| Residential And SMB Glo Fiber Expansion Markets | $23.0M | 25% |
| Commercial Fiber | $20.3M | 22% |
| RLEC Other | $6.8M | 7% |
