vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and CNA FINANCIAL CORP (CNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CNA FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($389.0M vs $80.1M, roughly 4.9× AMERISAFE INC). CNA FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 77.6% vs 10.2%, a 67.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERISAFE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs -2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERISAFE INC's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -2.2%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
CNA Financial Corporation is a financial corporation based in Chicago, Illinois, United States. Its principal subsidiary, Continental Casualty Company (CCC), was founded in 1897, and The Continental Insurance Company (CIC) was organized in 1853. CNA, the current parent company, was incorporated in 1967.
AMSF vs CNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $389.0M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $302.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 97.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | 77.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | -2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 1338.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $1.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $389.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $393.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $397.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $397.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $404.0M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $302.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $403.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $299.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $274.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $283.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $317.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | 97.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 95.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 87.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 90.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 99.5% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 75.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 69.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 78.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $1.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $11.6B |
| Total Assets | — | $69.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $10.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $10.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $69.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $69.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $68.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $67.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $66.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $67.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $65.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $570.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $542.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 139.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.6M | $570.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $720.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $562.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $638.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $703.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $748.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $616.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $542.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $704.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $538.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $620.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | $665.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $730.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $597.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 139.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 179.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | 135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 156.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.6% | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 182.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 147.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.02× | 1.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | 2.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.82× | 33.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | 2.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | 1.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
