vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERISAFE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.1M vs $40.6M, roughly 2.0× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -19.9%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERISAFE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs -20.7%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERISAFE INC's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -3.4%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
AMSF vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $46.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $-13.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | -12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | — | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $162.5M |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $305.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $412.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | -4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSF
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
