vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERISAFE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.1M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.4× Nano Dimension Ltd.). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -171.1%, a 181.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
AMSF vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $28.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $-79.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -279.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $231.8M |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $870.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $911.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
