vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP (PGC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.2M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.4× Nano Dimension Ltd.). PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -171.1%, a 186.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. PEAPACK GLADSTONE FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.8M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Peapack Gladstone Financial Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company that provides commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, private banking, lending solutions, and trust services, primarily serving individual and small-to-medium business clients across New Jersey and the surrounding U.S. Northeast region.
NNDM vs PGC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $78.2M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 31.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $70.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $56.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $53.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $658.2M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $7.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $658.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $629.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $621.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $605.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $607.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $588.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $582.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $43.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $28.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 36.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 18.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $43.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $71.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $852.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $28.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-431.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 101.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.76× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
PGC
| Banking Segment | $61.4M | 79% |
| Wealth Management Division | $13.9M | 18% |
| Other | $2.9M | 4% |
