vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sprout Social, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($120.9M vs $80.1M, roughly 1.5× AMERISAFE INC). On growth, Sprout Social, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 10.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Sprout Social, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 2.8%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Sprout Social, Inc. is a technology company that runs a social media management platform. A public company headquartered in Chicago, it was founded in 2010 by Justyn Howard, Aaron Rankin, Gil Lara, and Peter Soung.
AMSF vs SPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $120.9M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $120.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $115.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $111.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $109.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $99.4M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $-16.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 77.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 77.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 77.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 77.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | -7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | -12.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | -16.6% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | -10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -17.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $40.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $203.4M |
| Total Assets | — | $523.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.20× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $90.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | $101.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $100.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | $82.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | $80.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $203.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $194.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $184.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $175.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $166.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $158.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $152.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $523.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $481.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $422.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $424.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $428.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $388.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $393.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $10.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 8.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $39.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $1.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
