vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERISAFE INC (AMSF) and Vitesse Energy, Inc. (VTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERISAFE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.1M vs $58.6M, roughly 1.4× Vitesse Energy, Inc.). AMERISAFE INC runs the higher net margin — 10.2% vs -1.3%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERISAFE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.3% vs 4.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AMERISAFE INC's revenue compounded faster (2.8% CAGR vs -2.1%).
AMERISAFE Inc. is a specialty insurance provider that focuses exclusively on workers' compensation coverage for small and mid-sized businesses in high-hazard industries including construction, logging, trucking, and manufacturing. It operates across 49 U.S. states, offering tailored insurance policies paired with targeted risk management support for clients.
Vitesse Energy, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas assets. It operates primarily in high-potential onshore basins including North Dakota's Williston Basin, serving domestic and global upstream energy market demand.
AMSF vs VTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.1M | $58.6M |
| Net Profit | $8.1M | $-739.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.2% | -1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 85.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $80.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $81.6M | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.0M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $81.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.6M | $66.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.0M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.7M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.8M | $66.6M |
| Q1 26 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4M | $-739.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.0M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.2M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $10.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.6% | -12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 25.2% |
| Q1 26 | 10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.9% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 30.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.8% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 16.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.47 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.69 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.57 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $246.6M | $629.3M |
| Total Assets | — | $893.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $246.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $251.6M | $629.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $650.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $265.6M | $671.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $667.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.3M | $500.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $314.4M | $520.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $301.0M | $518.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $893.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $932.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $951.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $975.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $810.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $791.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $778.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $37.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7M | $49.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $34.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $45.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $35.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.61× | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.20× | 6.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.59× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.24× | 3.22× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMSF
Segment breakdown not available.
VTS
| Oil Reserves | $54.5M | 93% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $4.2M | 7% |
