vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Tower (AMT) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.4× American Tower). American Tower runs the higher net margin — 110.1% vs -4.8%, a 114.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Tower posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 2.2%).
American Tower Corporation, one of the largest global REITs, is a leading independent owner, operator and developer of multitenant communications real estate with a portfolio of approximately 219,000 communications sites. For more information about American Tower, please visit the Earnings Materials and Investor Presentations sections of our investor relations website at www.americantower.com.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
AMT vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $3.0B | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 110.1% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.6% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $836.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.5M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-780.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.4M | $161.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | 110.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.7% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.63 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.92 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | — | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $676.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.8B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.8B | $41.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.82× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $941.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.7B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $941.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $994.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $976.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 138.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 145.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.37× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 6.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
