vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Tower (AMT) and U-Haul Holding Co (UHAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Tower is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.9× U-Haul Holding Co). American Tower runs the higher net margin — 110.1% vs 2.6%, a 107.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. American Tower produced more free cash flow last quarter ($941.0M vs $-447.6M).
American Tower Corporation, one of the largest global REITs, is a leading independent owner, operator and developer of multitenant communications real estate with a portfolio of approximately 219,000 communications sites. For more information about American Tower, please visit the Earnings Materials and Investor Presentations sections of our investor relations website at www.americantower.com.
U-Haul Holding Company is an American moving truck, trailer, and self-storage rental company, based in Phoenix, Arizona that has been in operation since 1945. The company was founded by Leonard Shoen and Anna Mary Carty in Ridgefield, Washington who began it in a garage owned by Carty's family, and expanded it through franchising with gas stations. U-Haul has been known to rent to 50 states of the U.S. and the 10 Canadian Provinces.
AMT vs UHAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $3.0B | $37.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 96.4% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Net Margin | 110.1% | 2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -45.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $232.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $836.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $912.6M | $105.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.5M | $142.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $498.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-780.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $908.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 96.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 96.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 110.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.6% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.76 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.82 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.63 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.69 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.92 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.2B | $7.7B |
| Total Assets | — | $21.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $877.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.8B | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.2B | $21.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9B | $21.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.8B | $20.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.26× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.82× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.24× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $240.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $941.0M | $-447.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 34.4% | -31.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.8% | 48.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.7B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $240.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $551.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $598.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $941.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $-447.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $994.5M | $-446.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $976.9M | $-318.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $963.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 138.2% | -31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | -25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | -137.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 145.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 61.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | 395.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.53× | 6.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.60× | 5.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.37× | 4.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMT
Segment breakdown not available.
UHAL
| Long Term Contract With Customer | $1.2B | 82% |
| CA | $74.0M | 5% |
| Life Insurance | $56.2M | 4% |
| Accident And Health Insurance Segment | $49.8M | 4% |
| Investments Segment | $47.3M | 3% |
| Property And Casualty Insurance | $42.5M | 3% |
| Mercury | $1.6M | 0% |
