vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AEMETIS, INC (AMTX) and KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. (KREF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AEMETIS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.3M vs $25.8M, roughly 1.7× KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.). On growth, AEMETIS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.9% vs -26.6%). Over the past eight quarters, KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-18.8% CAGR vs -22.8%).
Aemetis, Inc. is a renewable fuels and sustainable biochemicals producer operating across North America and India. Its core products include low-carbon ethanol, renewable natural gas and biodiesel, serving transportation, industrial and agricultural sectors with decarbonization solutions for commercial clients.
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. is a specialized real estate finance firm sponsored by global investment firm KKR. It primarily originates, acquires, and manages a portfolio of senior secured commercial real estate loans, mostly backed by high-quality institutional commercial properties across the United States, delivering stable risk-adjusted returns to investors via interest income from its diversified assets.
AMTX vs KREF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $43.3M | $25.8M |
| Net Profit | — | $-26.2M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -5.7% | -105.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -101.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.9% | -26.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -229.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $43.3M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.2M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | $31.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $66.6M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.6M | $39.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.4M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.9M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-29.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-24.2M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -5.7% | -105.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.4% | 50.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.4% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -36.3% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -28.7% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.4% | 63.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.0% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.1% | 54.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.8% | -98.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -57.2% | -15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.0% | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -43.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -33.4% | -7.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.37 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.41 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.47 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.29 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.38 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.66 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.58 | $-0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $84.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-306.8M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $259.8M | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6M | $204.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $107.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $499.0K | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $898.0K | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $296.0K | $108.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.0K | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6M | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $338.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $322.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $307.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-306.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-304.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-289.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-280.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-263.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-258.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-249.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-232.1M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $259.8M | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $241.1M | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.0M | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $242.5M | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.3M | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.3M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $259.3M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $259.3M | $7.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.8M | $72.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -24.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-22.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $72.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $18.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $21.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $160.0K | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.6M | $132.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.1M | $30.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.3M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-19.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMTX
| Ethanol Sales | $28.8M | 66% |
| Wet Distillers Grains | $6.8M | 16% |
| California Dairy Renewable Natural Gas | $5.2M | 12% |
| Other | $1.8M | 4% |
KREF
Segment breakdown not available.
