vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMAZE HOLDINGS, INC. (AMZE) and Chewy, Inc. (CHWY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMAZE HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 19743.5% vs 1.9%, a 19741.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Chewy, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs -457.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Chewy, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
AMAZE is a virtual reality concert production company founded in July 2015 by former executives and founders of Kakao. Its headquarters is located in Los Angeles, California, with a second office in Seoul, South Korea. AMAZE develops VR concert experiences for global pop and K-pop artists, distributed via VR headset apps and theatrical installations.
Chewy, Inc. is an American online retailer of pet food and other pet-related products based in Plantation, Florida. Chewy went public in 2019 with the ticker symbol CHWY on the New York Stock Exchange.
AMZE vs CHWY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-217.2K | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $-42.9M | $59.2M |
| Gross Margin | 178.3% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20191.9% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 19743.5% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -457.2% | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -38251.0% | 1405.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.06 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-217.2K | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $869.9K | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.2K | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8K | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2K | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.5K | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.6K | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $-42.9M | $59.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $62.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $62.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-111.8K | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-315.3K | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-879.6K | $66.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | 178.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 93.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.3% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.8% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -62.0% | 29.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.4% | 28.2% |
| Q4 25 | 20191.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -347.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -492.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3138.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1190.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -488.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1247.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1159.4% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 19743.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -410.4% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -580.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3469.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -183.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -498.8% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1247.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1159.4% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-4.06 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.85 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.14 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.92 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.53 | $0.68 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.30 | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $701.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.8M | $469.4M |
| Total Assets | $34.2M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $701.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $591.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $616.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $596.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.0K | $507.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $695.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.0K | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0K | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.8M | $469.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.2M | $389.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $375.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.9M | $261.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $486.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $642.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.0M | $510.2M |
| Q4 25 | $34.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $98.5M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.8M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.8K | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $856.7K | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.9K | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-7.7M | $207.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $175.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $487.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-7.7M | $207.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.9M | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.5M | $86.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $207.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-585.0K | $183.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-400.2K | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-613.7K | $81.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-332.8K | $98.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $175.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $156.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $66.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
