vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Baker Hughes (BKR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Baker Hughes is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.6B vs $9.1M, roughly 721.0× AleAnna, Inc.). Baker Hughes runs the higher net margin — 14.1% vs 2.8%, a 11.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Anna University is a public state university located in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The main campus is in Guindy. It was originally established on 4 September 1978 and is named after C. N. Annadurai, former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu.
Baker Hughes Company is an American global energy technology company co-headquartered in Houston, Texas and London, UK. As one of the world's largest oil field services, industrial and energy technology companies, it provides products and services to the oil and gas industry for exploration and production, as well as other energy and industrial applications. It operates in over 120 countries, with facilities in Australia, Brazil, Singapore, Malaysia, India, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Germany, ...
ANNA vs BKR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.1M | $6.6B |
| Net Profit | $258.1K | $930.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | — |
| Net Margin | 2.8% | 14.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 102.7% | 131.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1M | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $644.6K | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $648.3K | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $930.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.1K | $876.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $609.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $644.7K | $701.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $402.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-77.2K | $766.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $579.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -562.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -227.1% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -518.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.8M | $14.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $16.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $58.7M | $19.5B |
| Total Assets | $101.3M | $50.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.83× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.7M | $18.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.3M | $18.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $17.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.8M | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $16.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $50.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.3M | $40.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.1M | $39.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.9M | $38.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.0M | $38.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $38.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.3M | $37.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.38× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $210.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 14.51× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $929.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-700.0K | $510.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $709.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $348.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $210.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $634.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $209.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $409.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $710.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $56.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.51× | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.09× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
