vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. (AOMR) and Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Curbline Properties Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($54.1M vs $10.9M, roughly 5.0× Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc.). Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs 17.6%, a 86.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust focused on investing in residential mortgage assets, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and credit-linked real estate instruments. It serves U.S. institutional and retail investors, targeting competitive risk-adjusted returns through regular income and long-term capital growth.
AOMR vs CURB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $54.1M |
| Net Profit | $11.3M | $9.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | 17.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 175.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $54.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $41.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $38.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.0K | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $10.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-273.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 112.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 203.5% | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 345.9% | -51.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 150.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.6M | $289.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | $423.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $267.5M | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.51× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $430.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $429.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $594.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $423.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $396.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $267.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.51× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.37× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-52.5M | $25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.64× | 2.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-52.5M | $25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-173.4M | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-201.7M | $25.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-25.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | -4.64× | 2.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.19× | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.92× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.83× | 2.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
