vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. (AOMR) and SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.5M vs $10.9M, roughly 1.3× Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc.). Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 103.9% vs -17.0%, a 120.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 10.4%). Over the past eight quarters, SS Innovations International, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (99.9% CAGR vs 12.7%).
Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust focused on investing in residential mortgage assets, including non-agency mortgage-backed securities, residential mortgage loans, and credit-linked real estate instruments. It serves U.S. institutional and retail investors, targeting competitive risk-adjusted returns through regular income and long-term capital growth.
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
AOMR vs SSII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.9M | $14.5M |
| Net Profit | $11.3M | $-2.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | 103.9% | -17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.4% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 175.2% | -28.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | $14.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6M | $3.6M |
| Q4 25 | $11.3M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $767.0K | $-256.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-15.1M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.2M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-273.0K | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -115.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.4% | -90.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -270.3% |
| Q4 25 | 103.9% | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 112.1% | -29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 203.5% | -111.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -152.6% | -23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 345.9% | -74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | -91.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 150.1% | -270.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.03 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.87 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.62 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.51 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.6M | $3.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $267.5M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $74.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 8.51× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.5M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.8M | $466.5K | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $220.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.0M | $608.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.4M | $948.1K |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $267.5M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $264.2M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $246.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $251.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.0M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.8M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $263.3M | $16.7M |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $74.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $69.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $35.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 8.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-407.0M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -35.96× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-22.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-407.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-173.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.6M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-201.7M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-221.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-212.4M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.2M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.2M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -64.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -136.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -96.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -76.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | -35.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.92× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AOMR
| Nonrelated Party | $6.4M | 59% |
| Other | $4.5M | 41% |
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
