vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (LOCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($163.8M vs $126.2M, roughly 1.3× El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.). El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.5% vs -8.4%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs -0.5%). Over the past eight quarters, El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.
El Pollo Loco, Inc., is a restaurant chain based in the United States, specializing in Mexican-style grilled chicken. Restaurant service consists of dine-in and take-out, with some locations offering drive-through options. The company is headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, and operates about 500 company-owned and franchised restaurants in the Southwestern United States.
AOSL vs LOCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $163.8M | $126.2M |
| Net Profit | $-13.8M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 70.3% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -8.4% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | 5.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.8% | 48.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.46 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $163.8M | $126.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $162.3M | $123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.5M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $176.5M | $125.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.6M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $173.2M | $114.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.9M | $120.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $161.3M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-13.8M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.3M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.1M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.1M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $7.6M |
| Q1 26 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 70.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.5% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.4% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.9% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | -8.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -8.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.8% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | 6.2% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.46 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.45 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.61 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.37 | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.09 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.09 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $190.3M | $3.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $800.2M | $302.5M |
| Total Assets | $976.4M | $609.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $190.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.5M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $182.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $176.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.1M | $10.5M |
| Q1 26 | $4.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.9M | $69.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | $800.2M | $302.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $818.8M | $291.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $834.1M | $282.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.3M | $274.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $886.3M | $265.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.6M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $895.3M | $255.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $891.6M | $248.6M |
| Q1 26 | $976.4M | $609.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $606.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $602.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $596.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $590.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $590.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $593.8M |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.02× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.03× | 0.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
