vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd (AOSL) and Xponential Fitness, Inc. (XPOF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($162.3M vs $83.0M, roughly 2.0× Xponential Fitness, Inc.). ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd runs the higher net margin — -8.2% vs -39.6%, a 31.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Xponential Fitness, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -6.3%). Xponential Fitness, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.2M vs $-23.1M). Over the past eight quarters, ALPHA & OMEGA SEMICONDUCTOR Ltd's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs 2.0%).

Alpha & Omega Semiconductor Ltd designs, manufactures and markets a broad portfolio of power semiconductors, including power MOSFETs, IGBTs, analog ICs and power management modules. Its products are applied across consumer electronics, industrial equipment, automotive systems, telecom and computing segments, with sales networks covering major global markets.

Xponential Fitness is one of the largest global franchisor of fitness boutiques. Its franchises operate in 49 U.S. states and 31 countries with more than 3,000 studios open. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

AOSL vs XPOF — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AOSL
AOSL
2.0× larger
AOSL
$162.3M
$83.0M
XPOF
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
XPOF
XPOF
+6.0% gap
XPOF
-0.3%
-6.3%
AOSL
Higher net margin
AOSL
AOSL
31.4% more per $
AOSL
-8.2%
-39.6%
XPOF
More free cash flow
XPOF
XPOF
$33.3M more FCF
XPOF
$10.2M
$-23.1M
AOSL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
AOSL
AOSL
Annualised
AOSL
4.0%
2.0%
XPOF

Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Revenue
$162.3M
$83.0M
Net Profit
$-13.3M
$-32.9M
Gross Margin
21.5%
Operating Margin
-8.4%
-9.9%
Net Margin
-8.2%
-39.6%
Revenue YoY
-6.3%
-0.3%
Net Profit YoY
-101.0%
24.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.45
$-1.18

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$162.3M
$83.0M
Q3 25
$182.5M
$78.8M
Q2 25
$176.5M
$76.2M
Q1 25
$164.6M
$76.9M
Q4 24
$173.2M
$83.2M
Q3 24
$181.9M
$80.5M
Q2 24
$161.3M
$76.9M
Q1 24
$150.1M
$79.7M
Net Profit
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$-13.3M
$-32.9M
Q3 25
$-2.1M
$-4.9M
Q2 25
$-77.1M
$969.0K
Q1 25
$-10.8M
$-1.9M
Q4 24
$-6.6M
$-43.5M
Q3 24
$-2.5M
$-12.1M
Q2 24
$-2.7M
$-9.6M
Q1 24
$-11.2M
$-2.5M
Gross Margin
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
21.5%
Q3 25
23.5%
Q2 25
23.4%
Q1 25
21.4%
Q4 24
23.1%
Q3 24
24.5%
Q2 24
25.7%
Q1 24
23.7%
Operating Margin
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
-8.4%
-9.9%
Q3 25
-2.5%
4.5%
Q2 25
-6.6%
19.5%
Q1 25
-6.5%
12.6%
Q4 24
-3.4%
-62.4%
Q3 24
-0.1%
-8.2%
Q2 24
-0.9%
-4.0%
Q1 24
-7.0%
10.0%
Net Margin
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
-8.2%
-39.6%
Q3 25
-1.2%
-6.2%
Q2 25
-43.7%
1.3%
Q1 25
-6.6%
-2.5%
Q4 24
-3.8%
-52.3%
Q3 24
-1.4%
-15.1%
Q2 24
-1.7%
-12.4%
Q1 24
-7.5%
-3.1%
EPS (diluted)
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$-0.45
$-1.18
Q3 25
$-0.07
$-0.18
Q2 25
$-2.61
$-0.01
Q1 25
$-0.37
$-0.10
Q4 24
$-0.23
$-1.39
Q3 24
$-0.09
$-0.29
Q2 24
$-0.09
$-0.30
Q1 24
$-0.39
$-0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$196.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$525.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$818.8M
$-269.1M
Total Assets
$1.0B
$345.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$196.3M
Q3 25
$223.5M
Q2 25
$153.1M
Q1 25
$169.4M
Q4 24
$182.6M
Q3 24
$176.0M
Q2 24
$175.1M
Q1 24
$174.4M
Total Debt
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$525.0M
Q3 25
$376.4M
Q2 25
$14.9M
$377.8M
Q1 25
$379.1M
Q4 24
$352.4M
Q3 24
$353.8M
Q2 24
$26.7M
$330.1M
Q1 24
$331.4M
Stockholders' Equity
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$818.8M
$-269.1M
Q3 25
$834.1M
$-230.4M
Q2 25
$822.3M
$-225.0M
Q1 25
$886.3M
$-225.2M
Q4 24
$902.6M
$-216.6M
Q3 24
$895.3M
$-155.7M
Q2 24
$891.6M
$-151.9M
Q1 24
$888.9M
$-144.4M
Total Assets
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$1.0B
$345.6M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$355.3M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$399.8M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$412.4M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$403.4M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$472.2M
Q2 24
$1.1B
$475.2M
Q1 24
$1.2B
$508.4M
Debt / Equity
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
0.02×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
0.03×
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-8.1M
$10.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-23.1M
$10.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-14.2%
12.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
9.2%
0.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-40.9M
$24.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$-8.1M
$10.7M
Q3 25
$10.2M
$9.3M
Q2 25
$-2.8M
$2.5M
Q1 25
$7.4M
$5.8M
Q4 24
$14.1M
$776.0K
Q3 24
$11.0M
$5.2M
Q2 24
$7.1M
$3.0M
Q1 24
$28.2M
$2.7M
Free Cash Flow
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
$-23.1M
$10.2M
Q3 25
$420.0K
$8.2M
Q2 25
$-17.2M
$996.0K
Q1 25
$-1.1M
$5.4M
Q4 24
$6.6M
$674.0K
Q3 24
$4.1M
$3.4M
Q2 24
$-210.0K
$872.0K
Q1 24
$20.5M
$1.8M
FCF Margin
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
-14.2%
12.3%
Q3 25
0.2%
10.4%
Q2 25
-9.7%
1.3%
Q1 25
-0.6%
7.0%
Q4 24
3.8%
0.8%
Q3 24
2.3%
4.2%
Q2 24
-0.1%
1.1%
Q1 24
13.7%
2.3%
Capex Intensity
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
9.2%
0.6%
Q3 25
5.4%
1.4%
Q2 25
8.1%
2.0%
Q1 25
5.1%
0.6%
Q4 24
4.3%
0.1%
Q3 24
3.8%
2.3%
Q2 24
4.5%
2.8%
Q1 24
5.2%
1.1%
Cash Conversion
AOSL
AOSL
XPOF
XPOF
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
2.60×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AOSL
AOSL

Power Discrete$101.0M62%
Power Ic$58.8M36%
Packaging And Testing Services$2.5M2%

XPOF
XPOF

Franchise$51.5M62%
Products$9.7M12%
Franchise Marketing Fund Revenue$8.9M11%
Service Other$8.3M10%
Spartan Fitness$4.5M5%

Related Comparisons