vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and DMC Global Inc. (BOOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.4× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). DMC Global Inc. runs the higher net margin — -7.8% vs -55.2%, a 47.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -5.8%). DMC Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.6M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -7.3%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
AP vs BOOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $143.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-11.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -7.8% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -3871.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $155.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $152.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $171.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $166.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $116.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $677.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $296.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-101.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.4% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -97.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -66.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-8.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $31.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $50.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $242.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $635.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $20.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $50.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $58.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $72.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $70.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $88.0M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $242.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $253.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $253.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $253.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $256.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $416.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $409.9M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $635.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $644.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $645.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $670.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $671.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $869.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $860.0M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.20× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $15.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $9.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 6.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $37.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $13.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $709.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-204.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 131.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 6.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 39.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.58× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
