vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (CTKB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $62.1M, roughly 1.7× Cytek Biosciences, Inc.). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP runs the higher net margin — -55.2% vs -70.9%, a 15.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 8.1%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-1.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.7% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells high-performance flow cytometry systems, associated reagents and analysis software. Its solutions serve life science research, clinical diagnostics and biopharmaceutical sectors, with a global customer base across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
AP vs CTKB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $62.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-44.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -9.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -70.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -557.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $46.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $44.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-44.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $941.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.3% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -9.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -23.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -23.9% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -13.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $90.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $341.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $461.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $90.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $93.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $95.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $98.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $177.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $341.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $378.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $377.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $379.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $395.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $385.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $389.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $392.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $461.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $494.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $493.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $482.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $499.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $491.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $483.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $492.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-771.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -2.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-8.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-771.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $108.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-125.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-974.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $3.4M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
CTKB
| Products | $46.6M | 75% |
| Services | $15.5M | 25% |
