vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Envela Corp (ELA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $80.5M, roughly 1.3× Envela Corp). Envela Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -55.2%, a 62.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Envela Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (66.6% vs 11.5%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-3.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Envela Corp's revenue compounded faster (42.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Envela Corporation is a U.S.-based company that provides recommerce services aimed at extending product lifecycles and reducing resource consumption. The company operates through two primary segments: consumer and commercial.
AP vs ELA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $80.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.5% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 9.4% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 7.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 66.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 274.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $54.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $48.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $39.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $9.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $67.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $96.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.15× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $67.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $55.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $49.3M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $82.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $79.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $77.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $74.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-3.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $1.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-789.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $746.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 0.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 2.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | -0.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
ELA
| Consumer Segment | $67.7M | 84% |
| Commercial Segment | $12.8M | 16% |
