vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.0× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -55.2%, a 53.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
AP vs GDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $104.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 61.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -150.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-817.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $327.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $530.1M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $605.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $338.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $537.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $517.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $517.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $400.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $612.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $613.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $608.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $590.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $592.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $443.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
GDYN
Segment breakdown not available.
