vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $93.1M, roughly 1.1× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). Goosehead Insurance, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8.6% vs -55.2%, a 63.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Goosehead Insurance, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.1% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Goosehead Insurance, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.2% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
AP vs GSHD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $93.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $8.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 16.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 8.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 23.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 204.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $93.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $94.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $75.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $93.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $78.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $78.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $6.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.48 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $25.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-121.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $392.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $34.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $92.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $70.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $54.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $47.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $23.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $289.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $290.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $289.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $290.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $82.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $87.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-121.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-95.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $-78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $-88.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $43.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $39.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $392.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $414.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $403.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $436.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $412.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $397.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $358.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $338.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 2.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $71.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $86.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $70.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $18.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 81.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 23.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 6.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 4.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 3.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
