vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Goosehead Insurance, Inc. (GSHD) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.4M vs $93.1M, roughly 2.7× Goosehead Insurance, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 23.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 9.2%).
Goosehead Insurance is a U.S.-based personal lines insurance agency that offers a wide range of coverage products including auto, home, renters, flood, and specialty insurance. It partners with hundreds of insurance carriers to provide clients with tailored, cost-effective coverage options, operating via corporate locations and a national franchise network for independent agents.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
GSHD vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $93.1M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $8.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 23.1% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 204.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.19 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $93.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $105.3M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.6M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.9M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $78.0M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | $131.1M |
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2M | $25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.7% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.7% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.48 | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.09 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.7M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-121.3M | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $392.8M | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.4M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.6M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.2M | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.6M | $47.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $289.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-121.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-95.5M | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-105.0M | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.6M | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-88.5M | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.3M | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.8M | $532.6M |
| Q1 26 | $392.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $414.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $403.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.6M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $412.6M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.7M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $358.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.2M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $91.8M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.2M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $55.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.1M | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 81.8% | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.2% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.9% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.7% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.1% | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.06× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.61× | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.61× | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.82× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.72× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | 2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GSHD
| Renewal Royalty Fees (2) | $43.6M | 47% |
| Renewal Commissions (1) | $18.2M | 20% |
| Contingent Commissions (1) | $10.7M | 11% |
| New Business Royalty Fees (2) | $7.9M | 8% |
| New Business Commissions (1) | $7.5M | 8% |
| Other | $3.7M | 4% |
| Initial Franchise Fees (2) | $1.6M | 2% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.
