vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Honest Company, Inc. (HNST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $88.0M, roughly 1.2× Honest Company, Inc.). Honest Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -26.8% vs -55.2%, a 28.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -11.8%). Honest Company, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($18.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Honest Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
The Honest Company, Inc. is an American digital-first consumer goods company, based in Los Angeles and founded by actress Jessica Alba, Christopher Gavigan, and Brian Lee. The company had $319 million in 2021 sales, and was valued at roughly $550 million as of February 2022. Carla Vernón, Chief Executive Officer, is one of the first Afro-Latina CEOs of a U.S. publicly traded company. The Honest Company has raised multiple rounds of venture capital, and went public via an initial public offeri...
AP vs HNST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $88.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-23.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -27.5% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -26.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -2813.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $88.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $92.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $93.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $97.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $99.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $99.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $93.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $86.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $758.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-809.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $165.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -27.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $89.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $169.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $225.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $89.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $72.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $53.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $33.6M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $190.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $187.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $180.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $174.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $133.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $129.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $124.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $225.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $241.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $249.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $265.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $247.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $209.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $200.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $198.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $19.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $18.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 20.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $13.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-504.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-745.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $336.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-624.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-826.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-17.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $260.0K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 91.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
HNST
Segment breakdown not available.
