vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and InvenTrust Properties Corp. (IVT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $77.4M, roughly 1.3× InvenTrust Properties Corp.). InvenTrust Properties Corp. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -55.2%, a 58.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 8.6%). InvenTrust Properties Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($110.9M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, InvenTrust Properties Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (7.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
InvenTrust Properties Corp. is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping malls. As of December 31, 2024, the company owned interests in 68 properties comprising 11.0 million square feet.
AP vs IVT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $77.4M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $2.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -11.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -72.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $77.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $74.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $73.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $71.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $66.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $95.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-539.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 130.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $825.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $2.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $825.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $764.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $746.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $740.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $740.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $812.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $827.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $155.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $110.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 143.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 57.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 58.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $193.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $155.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $38.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $46.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $110.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 143.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 51.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 141.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 57.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 50.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 58.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 13.97× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 31.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
IVT
Segment breakdown not available.
