vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and J.Jill, Inc. (JILL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
J.Jill, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.4× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). J.Jill, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -55.2%, a 61.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -0.5%). J.Jill, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, J.Jill, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
J.Jill is an American womenswear retailer founded in 1955 in Massachusetts. It has been a publicly traded company since 2017. J.Jill is headquartered in Quincy, Massachusetts.
AP vs JILL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $150.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $9.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.9% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -0.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -25.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $150.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $154.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $153.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $142.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $155.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $161.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $150.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 70.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 68.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 72.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $1.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $58.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $129.0M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $458.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $35.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $38.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $77.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $62.2M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $121.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $112.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $105.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $103.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $90.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $37.2M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $458.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $436.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $432.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $417.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $418.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $390.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $443.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $428.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $19.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 10.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $37.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $6.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
JILL
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $80.1M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $70.5M | 47% |
