vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $56.8M, roughly 1.8× LandBridge Co LLC). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs -55.2%, a 69.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 11.5%). LandBridge Co LLC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($122.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AP vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $19.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -197.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 71.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -222.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $360.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $296.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $162.3M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $710.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 60.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 90.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
LB
Segment breakdown not available.
