vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Life360, Inc. (LIF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Life360, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($146.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.4× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Life360, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 88.8% vs -55.2%, a 144.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Life360, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.4% vs 11.5%). Life360, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.6M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Life360, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (36.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Life360, Inc. develops family-focused safety and connectivity platforms. Core offerings include real-time location sharing, emergency alerts, driving behavior analysis tools and identity theft protection. It serves consumer markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, with most revenue from tiered premium subscription plans.
AP vs LIF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $146.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 88.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 26.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 1425.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $1.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $124.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $103.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $115.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $92.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $84.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 75.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 76.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -8.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 88.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -12.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $1.53 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $494.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $548.2M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $959.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $494.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $455.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $432.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $168.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $160.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $73.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $548.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $391.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $366.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $376.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $358.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $326.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $239.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $959.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $787.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $753.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $455.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $427.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $405.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $318.8M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $36.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 25.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.28× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $86.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.45× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
LIF
Segment breakdown not available.
