vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Lovesac Co (LOVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lovesac Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($150.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.4× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Lovesac Co runs the higher net margin — -7.0% vs -55.2%, a 48.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 0.2%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-10.2M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -22.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
The Lovesac Company is an American furniture retailer, specializing in a patented modular furniture system called Sactionals. Sactionals consist of two combinable pieces, “Seats” and “Sides,” as well as custom-fit covers and associated accessories. Lovesac also sells Sacs, a bag seat filled with a proprietary foam mixture.
AP vs LOVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $150.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-10.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -10.5% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -114.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $150.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $160.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $138.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $241.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $149.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $132.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $250.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $31.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.7% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.72 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $2.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $1.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $23.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $189.3M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $495.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $23.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $87.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $189.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $197.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $201.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $216.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $202.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $205.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $217.5M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $495.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $493.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $483.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $532.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $499.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $481.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $477.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $482.2M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-10.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-13.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $38.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $119.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $49.5M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
LOVE
| Showrooms | $102.7M | 68% |
| Internet | $37.3M | 25% |
| Other | $10.2M | 7% |
