vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and MFA FINANCIAL, INC. (MFA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $55.5M, roughly 1.9× MFA FINANCIAL, INC.). On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 9.2%). Over the past eight quarters, MFA FINANCIAL, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.7% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
MFA Financial, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in investing in and managing residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, mortgage loans, and other real estate-related financial assets. It caters primarily to institutional and individual investors across the U.S., focusing on delivering stable risk-adjusted returns via rigorous asset screening and risk management frameworks.
AP vs MFA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $55.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 97.9% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 9.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $55.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $57.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $50.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $53.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $47.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $48.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $48.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $23.2M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 97.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 54.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 70.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 98.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 79.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 50.7% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 84.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 54.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 71.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 95.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 78.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 48.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $213.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.8B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $213.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $275.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $253.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $338.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $305.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $289.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $306.3M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $12.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $11.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $11.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $10.9B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $76.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $76.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $38.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $53.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | -0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
MFA
Segment breakdown not available.
