vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $104.0M, roughly 1.0× Origin Bancorp, Inc.). Origin Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 26.6% vs -55.2%, a 81.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, Origin Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.9% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Southern Bancorp is a community development financial institution headquartered in Arkadelphia, Arkansas. It was founded in 1986 as Southern Development Bancorporation, and is often referred to simply as "Southern".
AP vs OBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $104.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $27.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 26.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.89 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $103.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $109.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $83.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $90.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $96.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $29.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $22.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $18.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 27.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 26.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 21.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.95 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.71 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.67 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $10.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $424.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $626.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $334.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $486.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $470.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $321.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $288.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $158.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $59.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $108.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $11.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $151.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $86.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $6.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 51.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 110.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.88× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 7.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
OBK
| Net Interest Income | $87.2M | 84% |
| Noninterest Income | $16.8M | 16% |
