vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and OPKO HEALTH, INC. (OPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OPKO HEALTH, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.5M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.4× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). OPKO HEALTH, INC. runs the higher net margin — -21.1% vs -55.2%, a 34.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -19.2%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-28.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP's revenue compounded faster (-2.6% CAGR vs -7.5%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
OPKO Health, Inc. is a medical test and medication company focused on diagnostics and pharmaceuticals. The company is a publicly traded company on NASDAQ and TASE under the symbol "OPK".
AP vs OPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $148.5M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-31.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | -25.8% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -21.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -19.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -322.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $151.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $156.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $150.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $183.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $173.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $182.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $173.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-31.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-148.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $-67.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-81.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | -25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | -44.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -41.2% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -94.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -45.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -47.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $364.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $344.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $412.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $267.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $428.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $426.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $400.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $75.6M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $344.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $344.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $343.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $439.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $437.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $441.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $201.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $350.1M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $-25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-28.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-190.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $-34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-34.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $-44.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-77.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-35.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-28.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-37.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-86.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-37.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-49.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-33.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-40.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -55.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -25.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -49.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -18.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | -3.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
OPK
| Services | $71.1M | 48% |
| Transfer Of Intellectual Property And Other | $33.7M | 23% |
| IE | $22.1M | 15% |
| Rayaldee | $8.8M | 6% |
| Barda Agreement | $6.8M | 5% |
| MX | $6.3M | 4% |
