vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and IMAX CORP (IMAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IMAX CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($125.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.2× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). IMAX CORP runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -55.2%, a 55.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IMAX CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.1% vs 11.5%). IMAX CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($28.0M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, IMAX CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.8% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
IMAX Corporation is a Canadian production theatre company which designs and manufactures IMAX cameras and projection systems as well as performing film development, production, post-production and distribution to IMAX-affiliated theatres worldwide. Founded in Montreal in 1967, it has headquarters in the Toronto area, and operations in New York City and Los Angeles.
AP vs IMAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $125.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $637.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 19.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 35.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -88.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $125.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $106.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $91.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $86.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $92.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $91.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $89.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $79.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $637.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $11.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 58.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 61.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 52.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 59.3% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 15.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $151.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $337.9M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $894.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $143.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $109.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $104.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $337.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $349.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $320.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $299.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $299.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $289.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $267.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $894.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $889.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $868.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $848.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $830.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $847.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $827.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $824.1M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $29.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $28.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 46.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $118.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $28.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $64.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $34.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -15.3% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 2.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 9.78× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
IMAX
| Technology Sales | $46.6M | 37% |
| Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services | $38.1M | 30% |
| Joint Revenue Sharing Arrangement | $20.4M | 16% |
| Maintenance | $16.3M | 13% |
| Finance Income | $2.8M | 2% |
| Other Content Solutions | $1.6M | 1% |
