vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and SMARTFINANCIAL INC. (SMBK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $53.8M, roughly 1.9× SMARTFINANCIAL INC.). SMARTFINANCIAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs -55.2%, a 80.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SMARTFINANCIAL INC.'s revenue compounded faster (15.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
SmartFinancial Inc. is a U.S.-based bank holding company that operates its wholly owned subsidiary SmartBank. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking products including deposit accounts, personal and business loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving individual customers and small-to-medium enterprises across the Southeastern United States.
AP vs SMBK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $53.8M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $13.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 25.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 21.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.81 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $53.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $46.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $40.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 26.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 25.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $346.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $562.2M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $346.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $464.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $557.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $365.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $423.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $387.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $192.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $342.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $7.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $12.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $562.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $552.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $538.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $519.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $505.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $489.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $472.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $4.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.03× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $52.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $16.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $15.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 111.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 28.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 98.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 38.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.27× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 5.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 2.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
SMBK
| Net Interest Income | $45.9M | 85% |
| Noninterest Income | $7.9M | 15% |
