vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. (STKS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($207.0M vs $104.4M, roughly 2.0× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). ONE Group Hospitality, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.1% vs -55.2%, a 52.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs -6.7%). AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-64.0K vs $-329.0K). Over the past eight quarters, ONE Group Hospitality, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (56.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
AP vs STKS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $207.0M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $-6.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | -3.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -531.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $180.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $211.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $221.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $194.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $172.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $85.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $-76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $975.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | -42.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | -4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -2.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-2.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $4.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $354.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $-75.8M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $884.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $32.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $15.4M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $354.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $355.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $347.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $348.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $348.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $349.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $350.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $73.5M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $-75.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $-61.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $40.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $45.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $68.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $68.3M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $884.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $879.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $935.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $956.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $960.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $953.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $945.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $309.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 15.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 8.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 7.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 6.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 5.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 1.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $13.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $-329.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | -0.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $-27.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $18.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $-329.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $733.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $287.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -6.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 8.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 12.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
STKS
| Benihanas | $111.3M | 54% |
| Steakhouse Restaurant | $59.2M | 29% |
| Grill Concepts | $32.3M | 16% |
| Other | $4.2M | 2% |
