vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($132.6M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.3× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs -55.2%, a 72.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (11.6% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
AP vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $132.6M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 17.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -6.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $132.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $106.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 28.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $50.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $78.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $3.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $39.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.73× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $182.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $153.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $41.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $81.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $42.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $19.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 68.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 18.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 84.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 95.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 5.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
UE
| Rental revenue | $124.2M | 94% |
| Other | $8.4M | 6% |
