vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of APA Corporation (APA) and BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC (EAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

APA Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.5× BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC). APA Corporation runs the higher net margin — 15.0% vs 8.7%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -24.3%). Over the past eight quarters, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 1.4%).

APA Corporation, a holding company for Apache Corporation, an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Houston.

Brinker International, Inc. is an American multinational hospitality industry company that owns Chili's and Maggiano's Little Italy restaurant chains. Founded in 1975 and based in Dallas, Texas, Brinker currently owns, operates, or franchises 1,672 restaurants under the names Chili's Grill & Bar and Maggiano's Little Italy worldwide.

APA vs EAT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
APA
APA
1.5× larger
APA
$2.2B
$1.5B
EAT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EAT
EAT
+27.5% gap
EAT
3.2%
-24.3%
APA
Higher net margin
APA
APA
6.3% more per $
APA
15.0%
8.7%
EAT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EAT
EAT
Annualised
EAT
10.3%
1.4%
APA

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Revenue
$2.2B
$1.5B
Net Profit
$331.0M
$127.9M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
32.5%
11.3%
Net Margin
15.0%
8.7%
Revenue YoY
-24.3%
3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-22.1%
7.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.79
$2.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$1.5B
Q4 25
$2.2B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$2.3B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$2.3B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$2.9B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$2.8B
$1.2B
Net Profit
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$127.9M
Q4 25
$331.0M
$128.5M
Q3 25
$205.0M
$99.5M
Q2 25
$603.0M
$107.0M
Q1 25
$418.0M
$119.1M
Q4 24
$425.0M
$118.5M
Q3 24
$-223.0M
$38.5M
Q2 24
$541.0M
$57.3M
Operating Margin
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
11.3%
Q4 25
32.5%
11.6%
Q3 25
33.7%
8.7%
Q2 25
31.8%
9.8%
Q1 25
31.9%
11.0%
Q4 24
31.4%
11.5%
Q3 24
-5.2%
5.0%
Q2 24
34.4%
6.1%
Net Margin
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
8.7%
Q4 25
15.0%
8.8%
Q3 25
9.0%
7.4%
Q2 25
26.0%
7.3%
Q1 25
15.4%
8.4%
Q4 24
14.6%
8.7%
Q3 24
-8.1%
3.4%
Q2 24
19.0%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$2.87
Q4 25
$0.79
$2.86
Q3 25
$0.57
$2.17
Q2 25
$1.67
$2.31
Q1 25
$0.96
$2.56
Q4 24
$0.97
$2.61
Q3 24
$-0.60
$0.84
Q2 24
$1.46
$1.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$516.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.3B
$424.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$6.1B
$406.0M
Total Assets
$17.8B
$2.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.70×
1.05×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
$516.0M
$15.0M
Q3 25
$475.0M
$33.6M
Q2 25
$107.0M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$67.0M
$17.5M
Q4 24
$625.0M
$14.8M
Q3 24
$64.0M
$16.2M
Q2 24
$160.0M
$64.6M
Total Debt
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$424.4M
Q4 25
$4.3B
$451.3M
Q3 25
$4.3B
$525.8M
Q2 25
$4.3B
$426.0M
Q1 25
$5.2B
$518.3M
Q4 24
$6.0B
$652.0M
Q3 24
$6.4B
$806.9M
Q2 24
$6.7B
$786.3M
Stockholders' Equity
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$406.0M
Q4 25
$6.1B
$379.3M
Q3 25
$6.0B
$343.9M
Q2 25
$5.9B
$370.9M
Q1 25
$5.4B
$259.0M
Q4 24
$5.3B
$131.5M
Q3 24
$5.1B
$12.7M
Q2 24
$5.4B
$39.4M
Total Assets
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$2.8B
Q4 25
$17.8B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$17.7B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$18.1B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$18.5B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$19.4B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$19.4B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$20.2B
$2.6B
Debt / Equity
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
1.05×
Q4 25
0.70×
1.19×
Q3 25
0.72×
1.53×
Q2 25
0.73×
1.15×
Q1 25
0.96×
2.00×
Q4 24
1.13×
4.96×
Q3 24
1.25×
63.54×
Q2 24
1.24×
19.96×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$808.0M
$571.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.44×
4.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
$571.8M
Q4 25
$808.0M
$218.9M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$120.8M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$186.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$212.0M
Q4 24
$1.0B
$218.2M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$62.8M
Q2 24
$877.0M
$141.5M
Free Cash Flow
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
$155.2M
Q3 25
$62.2M
Q2 25
$106.1M
Q1 25
$132.4M
Q4 24
$168.9M
Q3 24
$6.3M
Q2 24
$83.5M
FCF Margin
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
10.7%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
7.3%
Q1 25
9.3%
Q4 24
12.4%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
6.9%
Capex Intensity
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
4.3%
Q2 25
5.5%
Q1 25
5.6%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
5.0%
Q2 24
4.8%
Cash Conversion
APA
APA
EAT
EAT
Q3 26
4.47×
Q4 25
2.44×
1.70×
Q3 25
7.12×
1.21×
Q2 25
1.96×
1.74×
Q1 25
2.62×
1.78×
Q4 24
2.44×
1.84×
Q3 24
1.63×
Q2 24
1.62×
2.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

APA
APA

Oil And Gas Excluding Purchased$1.7B76%
Oil And Gas Purchased$323.0M15%
Oil Reserves$114.0M5%
Other$72.0M3%
Natural Gas Reserves$30.0M1%

EAT
EAT

Company sales$1.5B99%
Franchise revenues$14.7M1%

Related Comparisons