vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and HELEN OF TROY LTD (HELE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HELEN OF TROY LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($512.8M vs $335.5M, roughly 1.5× Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.2% vs -16.4%, a 51.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs -3.4%). Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.6M vs $5.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.7% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Artisan Partners is an American asset management company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Outside the United States, the company has offices in Dublin, Hong Kong, London, Singapore and Sydney.
Helen of Troy Limited is an American publicly traded designer, developer and worldwide marketer of consumer brand-name housewares, health and home, and beauty products under owned and licensed brands. It is the parent corporation of OXO International Ltd., Kaz, Inc., Steel Technology, LLC, and Idelle Labs, Ltd, among others. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda, with U.S. operations headquartered in El Paso, Texas. The company is named after the mythic figure Helen of Troy.
APAM vs HELE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $335.5M | $512.8M |
| Net Profit | $118.1M | $-84.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 39.2% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | 35.2% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.9% | -3.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.9% | -269.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.36 | $-3.65 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $335.5M | $512.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.3M | $431.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $282.7M | $371.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.1M | $485.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $297.1M | $530.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $279.6M | $474.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $270.8M | $416.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $264.4M | $489.2M |
| Q4 25 | $118.1M | $-84.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.8M | $-308.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $67.6M | $-450.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.1M | $50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $87.5M | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.6M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.5M | $42.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 49.0% |
| Q4 25 | 39.2% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | -73.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.2% | -109.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.7% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 13.5% |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | -16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | -71.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | -121.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.5% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.36 | $-3.65 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.93 | $-13.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $-19.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $2.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.99 | $2.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.03 | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.80 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.84 | $1.76 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $27.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $190.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $438.8M | $852.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $190.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.0M | $921.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.0M | $672.0M |
| Q4 25 | $438.8M | $852.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | $926.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $341.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.3M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.62× | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.0M | $11.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.6M | $5.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.2% | 1.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $420.6M | $55.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $172.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $58.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.9M | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $372.8M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.8M | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.0M | $73.6M |
| Q4 25 | $171.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.4M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $371.3M | $191.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $112.4M | $39.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $146.9M | $66.6M |
| Q4 25 | 51.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 125.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 55.6% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.58× | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.26× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.54× | 2.62× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.32× | 4.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.47× | 1.72× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APAM
Segment breakdown not available.
HELE
| Beauty Wellness | $283.2M | 55% |
| Home Outdoor | $229.6M | 45% |
