vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and CDW Corporation (CDW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $5.5B, roughly 1.2× CDW Corporation). On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (49.1% vs 6.3%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5B vs $395.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (40.6% CAGR vs 6.3%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
CDW Corporation is an American multi-brand provider of information technology services, serving business, government, education, and healthcare sectors across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Headquartered in Vernon Hills, Illinois, CDW is a Fortune 500 and generated $21 billion in annual net sales in 2023.
APH vs CDW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $5.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | — |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | 7.8% |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 49.1% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $2.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $291.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $271.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $316.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $281.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $548.7M | $216.1M |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.4% | 21.8% |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $2.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.97 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $2.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $2.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $1.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4B | $618.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $36.2B | $16.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $618.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $452.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $481.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $688.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $717.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $803.8M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7B | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $15.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $14.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | $13.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | $433.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5B | $395.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.8% | 7.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.4B | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $433.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $328.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $345.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $342.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $149.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.5M | $440.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $395.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $298.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $133.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $260.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $316.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $119.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.2M | $410.5M |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 1.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions Segment | $3.5B | 54% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions Segment | $1.7B | 26% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $1.4B | 21% |
CDW
Segment breakdown not available.
